tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6285930287778705862.post6910480121087088536..comments2023-09-30T04:53:57.201-05:00Comments on Kenton's Infotainment Scan: Eleven new words to make your own, beyotchKenton Larsenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10785680882442266009noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6285930287778705862.post-21925845173304348372011-07-21T11:00:29.637-05:002011-07-21T11:00:29.637-05:00I suffer from telephobia and have for years.I suffer from telephobia and have for years.Albertine Watsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6285930287778705862.post-8579956552318068592011-07-21T10:13:12.921-05:002011-07-21T10:13:12.921-05:00The best ads are "seemingly outrageous."...The best ads are "seemingly outrageous." If they were actually outrageous, people would get fired. Hence: "inrageous" - outrageous within the realm of acceptability. <br /><br />I give a big speech at school every year at work-placement time about how non-profits are awesome - my tongue-in-cheek word is only for laffs.Kenton Larsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09288769050712529811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6285930287778705862.post-57245589324208128072011-07-21T10:01:18.280-05:002011-07-21T10:01:18.280-05:00Can you explain 'inrageous' a bit? It seem...Can you explain 'inrageous' a bit? It <i>seems</i> outrageous, but...(what the 'in' part mean)?<br /><br />I have a small issue with non-profiteering: I don't think you meant it this way, but I've heard there's a sense that people who work in nonprofit do so because they "couldn't make it" in for-profit business. That's not true & I think your word suggests it. I still like you though.Erica Glasierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00675475507058385675noreply@blogger.com